Optical power limiter in the femtosecond filamentation regime
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present the use of a power limiting apparatus to evaluate ultrafast optical nonlinearities of transparent liquids (water and ethanol) in the femtosecond filamentation regime. The setup has been previously employed for the same purpose, however, in a longer pulsewidth (> 20 ps) regime, which leads to an ambiguous evaluation of the critical power for self-focusing. The uncertainty originates from the existence of a threshold power for optical breakdown well below the critical power for self-focusing within this timeframe. Contrarily, using the proposed apparatus in the femtosecond regime, we observe for the first time a unique optical response, which features the underlying physics of laser filamentation. Importantly, we demonstrate a dependence of the optical transmission of the power limiter on its geometrical, imaging characteristics and the conditions under which a distinct demarcation for the critical power for self-focusing can be determined. The result is supported by numerical simulations, which indicate that the features of the observed power-dependent optical response of the power limiting setup are physically related to the spontaneous transformation of the laser pulses into nonlinear conical waves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".