MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3180182513 · doi:10.23967/coupled.2021.003

A deterministic approach for shape and topology optimisation under material uncertainty in additive manufacturing

2021· article· en· W3180182513 on OpenAlexaff
Julien Cortial, Chiara Nardoni, David Danan, Felipe Bordeu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTopology Optimization in Engineering
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTopology (electrical circuits)Surface roughnessMathematical optimizationSurface finishNetwork topologyModulusContext (archaeology)MathematicsTopology optimizationCantileverComputer scienceStructural engineeringGeometryFinite element methodMaterials scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present work aims at handling uncertain materials in shape and topology optimisation applied to additive manufacturing. More specifically, we minimise an objective function combining the mean values of standard cost functions and assume that the uncertainties are small and generated by two random variables. These two variables representing the amplitude of the Young's modulus correspond to the zone of porosity inclusion and surface roughness defects. A deterministic approach that relies on a secondorder Taylor expansion of the cost function has been proposed by Allaire & Dapogny [2]. The present work proposes a general framework to handle uncertainties of the Young's modulus in which its amplitude is divided into N zones and then applied onto two zones corresponding to the porosity inclusion and surface roughness defects. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach in the context of the level-set-based topology optimisation for the robust compliance minimisation of three-dimensional cantilever test cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTopology Optimization in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207