MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3180197840 · doi:10.21037/cdt-21-135

Treatment of adults with Eisenmenger syndrome—state of the art in the 21st century: a short overview

2021· review· en· W3180197840 on OpenAlexaff
Gerhard‐Paul Diller, Astrid E. Lammers, Erwin Oechslin

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEisenmenger syndromeIntensive care medicinePediatricsInternal medicinePulmonary hypertension

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eisenmenger syndrome (ES) develops in association with unrepaired, non-restrictive cardiac shunt lesions at the atrial, ventricular or arterial level over time. In developed countries, cardiac defects are being operated on in a timely manner, before pulmonary vascular disease develops. However, with rising immigration from underserved countries, we increasingly see patients with shunt lesions, that are not amenable for repair as pulmonary vascular disease has already established. ES describes a symptom complex and patients present with heterogeneous problems involving many organ systems (multisystem disorder). Care in tertiary specialist cardiac centers with access to multidisciplinary subspecialities is required. Central cyanosis with secondary erythrocytosis is one of the key features of patients with ES. Clinical consequences of longstanding hypoxia can lead to other organ complications, that involve other organs than the heart alone. Although ES patients have a better prognosis compared to other patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, ES grossly affects quality of life and morbidity is frequent. Follow-up and care at specialist congenital heart disease centers is highly recommended to prevent, to early diagnose and to timely manage complications of ES. This is necessary to maintain functional capacity, decrease morbidity and increase life expectancy for these vulnerable patients. The leading reasons for mortality are sudden cardiac death, progressive heart failure, and infectious diseases. Various factors have been shown to be associated with mortality like decreased arterial oxygen saturation, functional class, impaired exercise tolerance, syncopal events, iron deficiency, presence of pre-tricuspid shunts, arrhythmias, increased (NT-pro) brain natriuretic peptide, echocardiographic variables of right ventricular dysfunction and hospitalization for heart failure. Although to date there is no causal therapy to reverse pulmonary vascular disease, a greater armamentarium of targeted therapies is available, which have been shown to be beneficial in patients with ES.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiovascular Diagnosis and TherapySame topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207