Abstract 2039: The role of HORMAD1 in DNA damage repair in squamous cell carcinomas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Genomic instability is a prominent hallmark of cancer, however the dynamic mechanisms that drive and sustain genomic instability remain elusive. Research demonstrates that numerous cancers with increased levels of genomic instability express meiosis genes and undergo a process called meiomitosis. Cancer meiomitosis is the orchestrated activation of both mitotic and meiotic machineries in neoplastic cells that confer a selective advantage. Specifically, meiCT (meiosis-specific cancer/testis) genes that specialize in the reductional division of germ cells in meiosis I are ectopically expressed in several cancers, particularly in squamous cell carcinomas. The meiCT gene, HORMAD1 is a meiosis specific protein that functions to ensure that a sufficient number of DSBs are formed for appropriate meiotic progression and to maintain genome integrity throughout homologous recombination. Studies show that HORMAD1 is significantly upregulated in several cancers and is regarded as a potentially important oncogene that plays a role in sustaining increased genomic instability. With the use of shRNA mediated knockdown of HORMAD1, we evaluated the effects ofHORMAD1 on genomic instability and survival in squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). Our results demonstrate that HORMAD1 knockdown in SCC cancer cell lines leads to an increase in genomic instability denoted by an increase in double strand breaks, micronuclei formation and ploidy. Furthermore, shHORMAD1 results in increased sensitivity to etoposide treatment leading to increased centrosome formation and reduced cell survival. We also demonstrate thatHORMAD1 modulates a functional and balanced level of genomic instability by eliciting an DNA damage response through homologous recombination mechanisms that allows SCCs to thrive following DNA damage. Citation Format: Jennifer Gantchev, Amelia Martinez Villarreal, Brandon Ramchatesingh, Ivan V. Litvinov. The role of HORMAD1 in DNA damage repair in squamous cell carcinomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2039.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".