MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W318031749

Control of White Mold of Bean Caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Using Organic Soil Amendments and Biocontrol Agents

2005· article· en· W318031749 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hung‐Chang Huang, R. S. Erickson, Chi Chang, J. R. Moyer, F. J. Larney, Jenn‐Wen Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueZhíwù bìnglǐxué huìkān · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSclerotinia sclerotiorumBiological pest controlBiologyAgronomyGerminationAmendmentSoil conditionerHorticultureSoil waterEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Field studies were conducted near Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada during 1999-2001 to determine the effectiveness of residue-based organic soil amendments, with or without biocontrol agents, for suppression of carpogenic germination of sclerotia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and control of white mold of bean. Results of 3-year field experiments showed that soil amendment with certain organic substances such as sweet clover straw (2.5 tonnes/ha) or fish meal (0.8 or 2.5 tonnes/ha) reduced the carpogenic germination of sclerotia of S. sclerotiorum and thereby reduced the incidence and severity of white mold of bean. Further studies revealed that the addition of biocontrol agents such as Coniothyrium minitans, Penicillium griseofulvum, or Trichoderma virens, enhanced the suppressive effect of the organic soil amendments on S. sclerotiorum. The study concludes that amending soil with a mixture of organic soil amendment and biocontrol agent is a promising, environmentally sound method for management of white mold of bean.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhíwù bìnglǐxué huìkānSame topicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanismsFrench-language works237,207