A comprehensive investigation of the intermolecular interactions between CH<sub>2</sub>N<sub>2</sub> and X<sub>12</sub>Y<sub>12</sub> (X = B, Al, Ga; Y = N, P, As) nanocages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we have theoretically determined the possibility of adsorption of the gaseous CH2N2 molecule on the surface of X12Y12 nanocages, where X = B, Al, Ga and Y = N, P, As. The electronic structure calculations have been performed by density functional theory (DFT) using four functionals (i.e., B3LYP-D3, M06-2X, ωB97XD, and CAM-B3LYP), together with the 6-311G(d) basis function. We find that the adsorption of CH2N2 on top of the X–Y bond of the nanocage is the most preferred site for adsorption. The adsorption process is accompanied by a charge-transfer phenomenon, which results in a strong bond between the terminal N atom of diazomethane and the X atom of the nanocage. This gives rise to significant changes in the highest and lowest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO and LUMO, respectively) energies and thus attribute properties to the nanocages that enable them to act as building blocks of CH2N2 sensing materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".