MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3180598743 · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(21)00219-9

Blood pressure thresholds in pregnancy for identifying maternal and infant risk: a secondary analysis of Community-Level Interventions for Pre-eclampsia (CLIP) trial data

2021· article· en· W3180598743 on OpenAlexafffund
Jeffrey N. Bone, Laura A. Magee, Joel Singer, Hannah L. Nathan, Rahat Qureshi, Charfudin Sacoor, Esperança Sevene, Andrew Shennan, Mrutyunjaya B. Bellad, Shivaprasad S. Goudar, Ashalata Mallapur, Khátia Munguambe, Marianne Vidler, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Peter von Dadelszen, Mai‐Lei Woo Kinshella, Hubert Wong, Faustino Vilanculo, Anifa Valá, Ugochi V Ukah, Domena Tu, Lehana Thabane, Corsino Tchavana, Jim Thornton, John Sotunsa, Sana Sheikh, Sumedha Sharma, Nadine Schuurman, Diane Sawchuck, Amit Revankar, Farrukh Raza, Umesh Y Ramdurg, Rosa Pires, Beth A. Payne, Vivalde Nobela, Cláudio Nkumbula, Ariel Nhancolo, Zefanias Nhamirre, Geetanjali I Mungarwadi, Dulce Mulungo, Craig Mitton, Mario Merialdi, Javed Memon, Analisa Matavele, Sphoorthi S Mastiholi, Ernesto Mandlate, Sónia Maculuve, Salésio Macuácua, Eusébio Macete, Marta Macamo, Mansun Lui, Jing Li, Gwyneth Lewis, Simon Lewin, Tang Lee, Ana Langer, Uday S Kudachi, Bhalachandra S. Kodkany, Marian Knight, Gudadayya S Kengapur, Avinash Kavi, Geetanjali Katageri, Chirag Kariya, Chandrappa C Karadiguddi, Namdev A Kamble, Anjali Joshi, Eileen K. Hutton, Amjad Hussain, Zahra Hoodbhoy, Narayan V Honnungar, William A. Grobman, Emília Gonçálves, Tabassum Firoz, Veronique Fillipi, Paulo Filimone, Susheela Engelbrecht, Dustin Dunsmuir, Guy A. Dumont, Sharla Drebit, France Donnay, Shafik Dharamsi, Vaibhav B Dhamanekar, Richard J. Derman, Brian A. Darlow, Silvestre Cutana, Keval S Chougala, Rogério Chiaú, Umesh Charantimath, Romano Byaruhanga, Helena Boene, Ana Ilda Biz, Cassimo Bique, Ana Pilar Betrán, Shashidhar G Bannale, Orvalho Augusto, J. Mark Ansermino, Felizarda Amose, Imran Ahmed, Olalekan O. Adetoro

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Global Health · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsCentre for Advancing Health OutcomesChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British ColumbiaProvidence Health Care Research InstituteCentre for Global Health ResearchBC Children's HospitalHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British ColumbiaBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsBlood pressureMedicineEclampsiaObstetricsAdverse effectPrehypertensionPregnancyPreeclampsiaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure measurement is a marker of antenatal care quality. In well resourced settings, lower blood pressure cutoffs for hypertension are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. We aimed to study the associations between blood pressure thresholds and adverse outcomes and the diagnostic test properties of these blood pressure cutoffs in low-resource settings. METHODS: We did a secondary analysis of data from 22 intervention clusters in the Community-Level Interventions for Pre-eclampsia (CLIP) cluster randomised trials (NCT01911494) in India (n=6), Mozambique (n=6), and Pakistan (n=10). We included pregnant women aged 15-49 years (12-49 years in Mozambique), identified in their community by trained community health workers, who had data on blood pressure measurements and outcomes. The trial was unmasked. Maximum blood pressure was categorised as: normal blood pressure (systolic blood pressure [sBP] <120 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure [dBP] <80 mm Hg), elevated blood pressure (sBP 120-129 mm Hg and dBP <80 mm Hg), stage 1 hypertension (sBP 130-139 mm Hg or dBP 80-89 mm Hg, or both), non-severe stage 2 hypertension (sBP 140-159 mm Hg or dBP 90-109 mm Hg, or both), or severe stage 2 hypertension (sBP ≥160 mm Hg or dBP ≥110 mm Hg, or both). We classified women according to the maximum blood pressure category reached across all visits for the primary analyses. The primary outcome was a maternal, fetal, or neonatal mortality or morbidity composite. We estimated dose-response relationships between blood pressure category and adverse outcomes, as well as diagnostic test properties. FINDINGS: Between Nov 1, 2014, and Feb 28, 2017, 21 069 women (6067 in India, 4163 in Mozambique, and 10 839 in Pakistan) contributed 103 679 blood pressure measurements across the three CLIP trials. Only women with non-severe or severe stage 2 hypertension, as discrete diagnostic categories, experienced more adverse outcomes than women with normal blood pressure (risk ratios 1·29-5·88). Using blood pressure categories as diagnostic thresholds (women with blood pressure within the category or any higher category vs those with blood pressure in any lower category), dose-response relationships were observed between increasing thresholds and adverse outcomes, but likelihood ratios were informative only for severe stage 2 hypertension and maternal CNS events (likelihood ratio 6·36 [95% CI 3·65-11·07]) and perinatal death (5·07 [3·64-7·07]), particularly stillbirth (8·53 [5·63-12·92]). INTERPRETATION: In low-resource settings, neither elevated blood pressure nor stage 1 hypertension were associated with maternal, fetal, or neonatal mortality or morbidity adverse composite outcomes. Only the threshold for severe stage 2 hypertension met diagnostic test performance standards. Current diagnostic thresholds for hypertension in pregnancy should be retained. FUNDING: University of British Columbia, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.232
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Global HealthSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207