MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3180708568 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v74i3.3153

Pharmacy Distribution, Clinical, and Management Services: A Survey of Small Hospitals in Canada Supported by Telepharmacy Services

2021· article· en· W3180708568 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Paula Newman, Sammu Dhaliwall, Olena Polyakova, Kevin McDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsMicropharma (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacyStaffingClinical pharmacyHospital pharmacyMedicinePharmacy practiceFamily medicineAcute careService (business)NursingMedical emergencyHealth careBusinessMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists’ Hospital Pharmacy in Canada Report presents data from pharmacy departments that service hospitals with at least 50 acute care beds. This report provides valuable data on pharmacy distribution, clinical, and management services in relation to hospital size, type, and geographic region. Pharmacy and hospital leadership use these extensive data in identifying baseline, benchmarking current, and planning enhanced pharmacy services. However, for most of Canada’s small hospitals, such data remain unknown, and leadership remains uninformed. Objective: To gather and analyze data about current pharmacy distribution, clinical, and management services in hospitals with fewer than 50 acute care beds receiving third-party remote pharmacy (telepharmacy) services. Methods: In April 2019, pharmacy administrators of hospitals in Ontario, Quebec, and Saskatchewan that had fewer than 50 acute care beds and were using third-party telepharmacy services were invited to complete a comprehensive survey addressing concepts similar to those in the Hospital Pharmacy in Canada Survey. The following data on clinical pharmacy practice were collected: models of care, assignments to patient care programs, pharmacists’ activities, performance indicators, and professional evaluation. The description of pharmacy distribution services comprised type of system, technology, location, hours of operation, method of medication order entry and verification, and medication administration records. Details on facilities’ parenteral admixture infrastructure, policy for and provision of sterile compounding, and pharmacy department human resources, including composition and staffing ratios, were also collected. Results: Of the 27 hospitals in Ontario, Quebec, and Saskatchewan that were invited to participate, 24 (89%) completed the survey. The median facility size was 19 acute care beds. Conclusions: Previously unavailable in Canada, these quantitative data from small hospitals supported by telepharmacy services provide facts about pharmacy distribution, clinical, and management services to inform hospital and pharmacy leaders. Creation of a survey unique to small hospitals, whether or not they use telepharmacy services, could provide a valuable resource to assist in the benchmarking, planning, and enhancement of pharmacy services in remote and rural communities. RÉSUMÉ Contexte : Le Rapport sur les pharmacies hospitalières canadiennes de la Société canadienne des pharmaciens d’hôpitaux expose les données provenant des services de pharmacie qui appuient les hôpitaux comptant au moins 50 lits de soins aigus. Il offre de précieuses données sur les services de distribution des médicaments, les services cliniques et de gestion en relation avec la taille, le type et la région géographique des hôpitaux. Les équipes de direction des pharmacies et des hôpitaux utilisent ces données exhaustives pour déterminer une base de référence, évaluer les services de pharmacie actuels et planifier l’amélioration des services. Cependant, la plupart des petits hôpitaux du Canada ne disposent pas de ce type de données, et les équipes de direction n’en sont pas informées. Objectif : Réunir et analyser des données sur la distribution de médicaments, les services cliniques et la gestion des services pharmaceutiques actuels dans les hôpitaux comptant moins de 50 lits de soins aigus, qui reçoivent des services de pharmacie à distance (services de télépharmacie) fournis par des tiers. Méthode : En avril 2019, les administrateurs de pharmacie d’hôpitaux en Ontario, au Québec et en Saskatchewan remplissant ces critères ont été invités à répondre à une enquête exhaustive abordant des concepts similaires à ceux de Sondage sur les pharmacies hospitalières canadiennes. Les données suivantes sur la pratique de la pharmacie clinique ont été recueillies : modèles de soins, affectation des pharmaciens à des programmes particuliers de soins des patients, activités des pharmaciens, indicateurs de performance et évaluation professionnelle. La description des systèmes de distribution des médicaments par les pharmacies comprenait : le type de système, la technologie, le lieu, les heures de service, le mode de saisie et de vérification des ordonnances de médicaments ainsi que les dossiers d’administration. Les détails concernant l’infrastructure pour l’administration de solutions parentérales, la politique relative aux composés stériles et à leur distribution ainsi que les ressources humaines des services de pharmacie, y compris la composition et les ratios en personnel, ont également été recueillis. Résultats : Sur les 27 hôpitaux en Ontario, au Québec et en Saskatchewan invités à participer à l’enquête, 24 (89 %) y ont répondu. La taille moyenne des installations était de 19 lits de soins aigus. Conclusions : Autrefois indisponibles au Canada, ces données quantitatives provenant de petits hôpitaux soutenus par des services de télépharmacie livrent des faits concernant le système de distribution des médicaments au sein des pharmacies, les services cliniques et de gestion, qui permettent de guider les cadres des hôpitaux et de la pharmacie. La création d’une enquête unique destinée aux petits hôpitaux, utilisant ou non des services de télépharmacie, pourrait constituer une précieuse ressource pour aider à évaluer, à planifier et à améliorer les services pharmaceutiques dans les communautés rurales et éloignées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital PharmacySame topicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesFrench-language works237,207