MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3180712247 · doi:10.1080/03461238.2021.1944905

A multivariate CVaR risk measure from the perspective of portfolio risk management

2021· article· en· W3180712247 on OpenAlex
Jun Cai, Huameng Jia, Tiantian Mao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueScandinavian Actuarial Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicRisk and Portfolio Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDynamic risk measureSubadditivityCVARRisk measureSpectral risk measureExpected shortfallCoherent risk measureTime consistencyMultivariate statisticsEconometricsPortfolioValue at riskRisk managementMeasure (data warehouse)Portfolio optimizationDownside riskActuarial scienceMathematicsCopula (linguistics)EconomicsComputer scienceStatisticsFinancial economicsFinanceData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we define a new multivariate conditional Value-at-Risk (MCVaR) risk measure. This MCVaR considers both individual risks and the aggregate risk of a portfolio, but prioritizes the aggregate risk. The new MCVaR risk measure is based on the minimization of the expectation of a multivariate loss function, which balances the shortfall and surplus risks of the aggregate risk and the individual risks in an overall risk of a portfolio. It is shown that the MCVaR risk measure holds the properties of positive homogeneity, translation invariance, subadditivity, and monotonicity under certain conditions. Numerical examples of the MCVaR risk measure are presented to illustrate the effect of dependence among individual risks on the MCVaR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it