Novel Apelin-expressing gCap Endothelial Stem-like Cells Orchestrate Lung Microvascular Repair
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Question We sought to define the mechanism underlying lung microvascular regeneration in a severe acute lung injury (ALI) model induced by selective lung endothelial cell ablation. Methods Changes in lung cell populations and gene expression profiles were determined in transgenic mice expressing human diphtheria toxin (DT) receptor targeted to ECs using single-cell RNA sequencing at baseline (day 0) and days 3, 5 and 7 after lung EC ablation. Results Eight distinct endothelial clusters were resolved, including alveolar aerocytes (aCap) ECs expressing apelin at baseline, and general capillary (gCap) ECs expressing the apelin receptor. Intratracheal instillation of DT resulted in ablation of >70% of lung ECs, producing severe ALI with near complete resolution by 7 days. At 3 days post injury, a novel gCap population emerged characterized by de novo expression of apelin, together with the stem cell marker, protein C receptor. These stem-like cells transitioned to proliferative ECs, expressing apelin receptor together with the pro-proliferative transcription factor, FoxM1 . This progenitor-like cell population was responsible for the rapid replenishment of all depleted EC populations by 7 days post injury, including aerocytes which play a critical role in re-establishment of the air-blood barrier. Treatment with an apelin receptor antagonist prevented recovery and resulted in excessive mortality, consistent with a central role for apelin signaling in EC regeneration and microvascular repair. Conclusion The lung has a remarkable capacity for microvasculature EC regeneration which is orchestrated by signaling between newly emergent apelin-expressing gCap endothelial stem-like cells and highly proliferative, apelin receptor positive endothelial progenitors. Take-Home message Using sublethal lung endothelial cell (EC) ablation, we show for the first that EC regeneration and resolution of acute lung injury is orchestrated by novel apelin-expressing, gCap endothelial stem-like cells by a mechanism requiring apelin signaling. Graphical Abstract A schematic representation of EC populations contributing to microvascular repair. At baseline (Day 0), there are two main alveolar groups of capillary ECs: larger apelin positive aCap ECs, termed aerocytes, that play a key structural role in forming the air-blood barrier; and smaller apelin receptor ( Aplnr ) expressing gCap ECs, which are found in the thicker regions at the corners of the alveoli. After DT-induced EC ablation, there is a marked depletion of both EC populations and the appearance of novel transitional and transient populations. At Day 3, there is the appearance of stem-like gCap ECs that paradoxically express apelin, but not its receptor, and are characterized by various stem and progenitor cell markers but show no evidence of proliferation. By Day 5, these transition to ECs expressing Aplnr which have a strong proliferative phenotype, as evidenced by FoxM1 and Ki67 expression, and then rapidly replenish depleted EC pools, including aCap ECs, by Day 7. This transition is orchestrated by the interaction of apelin with its receptor as a critical mechanism in lung microvascular regeneration after EC injury. AT1 = alveolar type −1 epithelial cell; AT2 = alveolar type-2 epithelial cell; APLNR = apelin receptor; ANGPT2 = angiopoietin 2; EPCR = Endothelial protein C receptor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".