MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3180848797 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2021-2512

Abstract 2512: BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and its clinical relevance among egyptian breast cancer women

2021· article· en· W3180848797 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samah A. Loutfy, Nasra F. Abdel Fattah, Ahmed Barakat, Omar R. Alfarouk, Tarek Hashem, Ahmed M. Osman, Shimaa A. Metwally, Maha A. Abo-Shadi, Amany Helal, Shaza A. Habib, A. Sherif, Abdel Wahab El Ghareeb, Mohamed M. Mouneer, Manar M. Moneer, Marwa A. Abdel-Wahed, Mona A. Salem, A. Salama, Fatma S. Hafez, Sara H. A. Agwa, Hesham Elghazaly, Manal Mohamed El-Mahdy, Mark Dunning, Sherif F. El‐Khamisy

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBRCA gene mutations in cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrameshift mutationBreast cancerExonCancerGeneticsBiologyGeneMutationMedicineCancer researchOncologyMolecular biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Breast cancer (BC) is a multifactorial disease, that is attributed to non-familial factors such as environmental or genetic factors that play a vital role in the development of the disease. BRCA1/2 mutations represent a high risk of breast cancer. The current study focused on exploring the relationship between the presence of BRCA1/2 mutations and some clinicopathological characteristics which might impact the pathogenesis of BC disease. Material and Methods: Genomic DNA samples were obtained from 19 fresh tissues using Gene JET Extraction Kit (Thermo Scientific/US, Canada), and 29 FFPE using QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, USA) obtained from pretreatment BC patients. Library preparation was performed using Devyser BRCA NGS kit (DEVYSER, Stockholm, Sweden), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The reagent kit V2, 500 Cycles PE, on the Illumina MiSeq System (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes reference were: NM_007300 and NM_000059, respectively. Variants were called using freebayes (1.1.0.46) and annotated using ANNOVAR(version2019Oct24). All samples were subjected for detection of Human Mammary Tumor Virus (HMTV) and Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNAs using qualitative PCR assay. Result: The study identified 40 and 54 different BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, mostly in the form of frameshift and stop codon mutations. Regarding, BRCA1, 14 pathogenic mutations were detected, exon10 and exon 9 showed to be the most affected exons representing (c.C1612T (25%) and c.C1471T(22.9%), respectively. For BRCA2, only five pathogenic mutations were identified, exon 11 and exon 14 showed to be the most affected exons (cT4001A(6.25%) and c.7231delA(4.16%), respectively. Regarding relation between BRCA1/2 genes mutations and clinicopathological parameters, BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers were younger than non-carriers though not significant (p=0.440). Regarding the tumor characteristics, BRCA1/2 carriers had large tumor size (p=0.091), high tumor grade compared to non-carriers but without significance (P=0.098). Micro-classifications positivity (60%) was also more frequently among BRCA1/2 carrier than non-carrier (p= 0.082). Regarding detection of HMTV and HPV, BRCA1/2 mutation carriers has a skew towards negative results (P=<0.001 and 0.004, respectively). Conclusion: Our data suggest that BRCA1/2 mutations might contribute to the pathogenesis among both familial and non-familial Egyptian breast cancer patients, but we need more sample size to confirm the findings. It also identifies the most affected exons in preparation for establishing a diagnostic tool like HRM for genetic counseling, which will help when selecting treatment modalities for BC patients. STDF Acknowledgment: This project was supported financially by the Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF), Egypt, Grant No.22944 Citation Format: Samah A. Loutfy, Nasra F. Abdel Fattah, Ahmed B. Barakat, Omar R. Alfarouk, Tarek M. Hashem, Ahmed M. Osman, Shimaa A. Metwally, Maha A. Abo-Shadi, Amany M. Helal, Shaza A. Habib, Ahmed A. El Sherif, Abdel Wahab El Ghareeb, Mohamed M. Mouneer, Manar M. Moneer, Marwa A. Abdel-Wahed, Mona A. Salem, Asmaa M. M. M. Salama, Fatma S. Hafez, Sara H. Agwa, Hesham Elghazaly, Manal M. El-Mahdy, Mark J. Dunning, Sherif F. El-Khamisy. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and its clinical relevance among egyptian breast cancer women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2512.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.372 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicBRCA gene mutations in cancer→French-language works237,207→