MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3180889850 · doi:10.22215/etd/2021-14419

Libra Association as a Case Study of Ecosystem Emergence

2021· dissertation· en· W3180889850 on OpenAlexaff
S. Brand

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicInnovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterdependenceEcosystemConstruct (python library)AllianceOrchestrationConsistency (knowledge bases)Association (psychology)Network theoryPerspective (graphical)Environmental resource managementBusinessKnowledge managementEcologyGeographyComputer scienceSociologyBiologyPsychologyEconomicsArtificial intelligenceSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ecosystems construct in combination with interorganizational network theories have been used to evaluate the emergency of the Libra Association ecosystem in a case study. Ecosystem formation is considered from the perspective of interdependencies, orchestration, and network structure; roles and phases are identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInnovation Diffusion and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207