MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3180950378 · doi:10.1002/cl2.1183

PROTOCOL: The effects of empowerment‐based nutrition interventions on the nutritional status of women of reproductive age in low‐ and middle‐income countries

2021· article· en· W3180950378 on OpenAlexaff
Alison Riddle, Abby Ramage, Cynthia M. Kroeger, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Elizabeth Kristjansson, Monica Taljaard, Carol Vlassoff, Sara Wuehler, Becky Skidmore, Alexandria Bennett, Anita Rizvi, Vivian Welch, George A. Wells

Bibliographic record

VenueCampbell Systematic Reviews · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsBruyèreOttawa HospitalNutrition InternationalSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpowermentPsychological interventionLow and middle income countriesProtocol (science)Women's empowermentLow incomePsychologyGerontologyMedicineDeveloping countryEconomic growthSocioeconomicsAlternative medicineSociologyEconomicsNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The systematic review will answer the follow research questions: (1) What is the effectiveness of different empowerment approaches employed within nutrition interventions on the nutritional status of women of reproductive age in low- and middle-income countries? (2) What implementation and contextual factors contribute to or detract from the effectiveness of these interventions?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.060
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.122
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0600.122
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0150.012
Bibliometrics0.0080.007
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0130.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1080.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCampbell Systematic ReviewsSame topicChild Nutrition and Water AccessFrench-language works237,207