Дослідження когнітивних функцій у хворих працездатного віку на гострий інфаркт міокарда
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study included 105 patients aged up to 60 years. The patients were divided into three age groups: 34–40 years, 41–50, 51–60 years respectively. In order to assess the state of cognitive impairment, use such neuropsychological tests as MMSE, the clock drawing test, and the «memorization of 10 words» test by A. R. Luria. Each group of patients was divided into 3 subgroups and entered, respectively, 3 treatment regimens. The first treatment regimen included quercetin, the second is quercetin + 2 ethyl-6-methyl-3-hydroxypyrimidine succinate, the third is quercetin + morpholini 3-methyl-1,2,4-triazolin-5 thiocetam. In patients of different age groups, with the help of neuropsychological tests with a high degree of reliability it can be argued that the use of morpholine 3-methyl-1,2,4-triazolin-5 tiocetam, led to improvement of cognitive functions according to the indicators of patients , receiving treatment according to Schemes 1 and 2. For the purpose of the rapid and effective recovery of cognitive functions in patients of working agewith acute myocardial infarction, from the first hour of hospitalization, the following regimen of treatment should be prescribed: quercetin and my foliniyu 3-methyl-1,2,4-tryazolin 5 tiotsetam for 10 days. This allows already at the 10th day to restore the initial level of cognitive function and in the future to significantly increase them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".