Management of Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Chronic Lung Disease
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a known complication of chronic parenchymal lung diseases, including chronic obstructive lung disease, interstitial lung diseases, and more rare parenchymal lung diseases. Together, these diseases encompass two of the five clinical classifications of PH: group 3 (chronic lung disease [CLD] and/or hypoxia) and group 5 (unclear and/or multifactorial mechanisms). The principal management strategy in PH associated with CLD is optimization of the underlying lung disease. There has been increasing interest in therapies that treat pulmonary arterial hypertension (group 1, PAH), and although some studies have explored the use of these oral PAH-targeted therapies to treat PH associated with CLD, there is currently no evidence to support their routine use; in fact, some studies suggest harm. Inhaled therapies that target the pulmonary vasculature may avoid certain problems observed with oral PAH therapies. Recent studies suggest a promising role for inhaled PAH therapies in group 3 PH, but this requires further study. The objective of this article is to review the current treatment strategies for group 3 and group 5 PH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it