MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract LB187: EGFR signaling and pharmacology in oncology revealed with an innovative RTK biosensor technology

2021· article· en· W3181160016 on OpenAlexaff
Florence Gross, Guilhem Dugast, Arturo Mancini, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Michel Bouvier, Stéphan Schann, Xavier Leroy, Laurent Sabbagh

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpiregulinEpidermal growth factor receptorReceptor tyrosine kinaseCancer researchInternalizationSignal transductionMAPK/ERK pathwayEndosomeERBB3AngiogenesisChemistryReceptorCell biologyPharmacologyBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract EGFR is involved in key biological processes and its deregulation is associated with the development of many cancers. EGFR is implicated in tumor invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis. Moreover, intrinsic and acquired mutations of EGFR have been described to modify receptor signaling and be responsible for the appearance of drug resistance during treatment in a clinical setting. Development of tools providing new insight into RTK complex mechanisms is crucial to develop more effective RTK-targeting drugs. In this study, we present a live-cell ebBRET-based biosensor platform which includes 12 distinct biosensors for monitoring SH2-domain containing proteins-mediated downstream signaling of RTKs, hence following the activation of MAPK, Akt and PKC pathways. These biosensors are designed to measure receptor proximal events that are engaged upon receptor activation at the plasma membrane (PM) and early endosomal compartments (EE). Using EGFR and two of its ligands as a model system, we showed the capacity of these biosensors to differentiate unique signaling signatures of EGFR, at the PM or the EE, with EGF and Epiregulin ligands displaying differences of efficacy and potency. Indeed, EGF was more potent and efficacious than Epiregulin on all the studied pathways. Also, we detected activities at the EE with EGF stimulation but not with Epiregulin. Our data highlight the platform's capacity to follow the trafficking of RTK biosensors into different compartments and to reveal internalization selectivity and bias which can be observed with different ligands. Overcoming resistance has become an important challenge when developing new therapeutics for the treatment of cancer. We further demonstrated that EGFR deletions or single point mutations, found in Gliobastoma or NSCLC, have an impact on the constitutive activity of EGFR and the signaling profiles but also on inhibitor efficacies which could impact receptor trafficking from the PM to the EE. In addition, the sensitivity of the RTK platform allowed us to measure the signaling of endogenously expressed EGFR in pathophysiologically-relevant cell lines commonly used for their oncogenic properties, such as A431 human epidermoid carcinoma cells, N87 gastric carcinoma cells and T47D, MCF7 and SK-BR-3 breast adenocarcinoma cells. Finally, we illustrated, using BRET-based imaging, the recruitment of SH2 effectors at the PM or at the EE after a 10-minute or 60-minute incubation respectively with EGF, highlighting the translatability of the biosensor platform to microscopy. The ebBRET-based biosensor technology displayed new insights in RTK biology and revealed different modes of action, extensive RTK signal profiling, and trafficking of RTK effectors. It represents a powerful tool for the analysis of RTK mutations and for the identification of novel generation of TKIs and antibodies directed against RTKs. Citation Format: Florence Gross, Guilhem Dugast, Arturo Mancini, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Michel Bouvier, Stephan Schann, Xavier Leroy, Laurent Sabbagh. EGFR signaling and pharmacology in oncology revealed with an innovative RTK biosensor technology [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB187.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207