MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3181169548 · doi:10.1136/sextrans-2021-sti.435

P405 Identifying subgroups at higher risk of infectious syphilis in major Australian cities: Analysis of national sentinel surveillance data 2011–2018

2021· article· en· W3181169548 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSyphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSyphilisMedicineDemographyPoisson regressionIndigenousMen who have sex with menEnvironmental healthFamily medicinePopulationHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> In Australia, infectious syphilis notifications have increased 234% in the past decade, from 1318 in 2008 to 4398 in 2017. Although historically concentrated among urban men who have sex with men and remote Indigenous communities, a rise in syphilis notifications among women in major cities and cases of congenital syphilis have been observed. We analysed trends in infectious syphilis positivity among women and heterosexual men in major Australian cities and identified associated risk factors. <h3>Methods</h3> De-identified patient data were extracted from 34 sexual health clinics within a national sentinel surveillance network (2011–18). All women and heterosexual men ≥ 15 years in major cities were included. Infectious syphilis positivity was defined as the proportion of attendees per 6-monthly calendar period with recorded syphilis testing who had recorded clinical diagnoses of infectious syphilis. Poisson regression determined annual trends in positivity and risk factors for infectious syphilis (rate ratios and 95% CIs). <h3>Results</h3> Of 100,230 patients attending the clinics, 50.8% were female (of whom, 96.1% were of childbearing age), 51.2% were aged 15–29 years, 1.7% were Indigenous and 7.4% were from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds. Modelled positivity for infectious syphilis (2011–18) increased 85% in females from 2.41 (95%CI:1.67–3.14) to 4.48 (95%CI:3.53–5.43) per 1000 patients tested, and 76% in heterosexual males from 4.47 (95%CI:3.44–5.49) to 7.87 (95%CI:6.49–9.24). Factors associated with increased risk of infectious syphilis included: reporting a history of injecting drug use (RR:4.36;95%CI:3.26–5.83), using condoms inconsistently in the past year (RR:2.30;95%CI;1.10–4.79), being male (RR:1.80;95%CI:1.51–2.14), Indigenous (RR:1.70;95%CI:1.02–2.84), from CALD backgrounds (RR:1.90;95%CI:1.46–2.46), and older (30–39 years: RR:1.33;95%CI:1.08–1.65; 40–49 years: RR:2.95;95%CI:2.34–3.73; 50+ years:RR:3.59;95%CI:2.81–4.57). Lower risk was observed in bisexual females (RR:0.53;95%CI:0.30–0.94) and female sex workers (RR:0.43;95%CI:0.29–0.63). <h3>Conclusion</h3> Increasing syphilis in women and heterosexual men in major Australian cities requires enhanced prevention, including integration of sexual and reproductive health care into harm reduction programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it