“Les images de nous en temps de tempête”: affect et habitus émotionnel de l’ <i>homo revendicus</i> dans les films d’Olivier Ducastel et Jacques Martineau
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis leur premier film, Olivier Ducastel et Jacques Martineau mettent l’accent sur des récits touchant au sida et ont contribué à l’émergence d’un personnage cinématographique spécifique: l’homo revendicus. Un tel personnage incarne une conscience politique aigue et se bat pour la justice sociale dans les films pré-trithérapies des cinéastes, Jeanne et le garçon formidable (1998) et Nés en 68 (2008). Cependant, même lorsque l’homo revendicus n’est pas physiquement présent, son habitus émotionnel joue un rôle important dans la vie des personnages séropositifs, comme il est le cas dans les œuvres post-trithérapies des cinéastes, à savoir Drôle de Félix (2000) et Théo et Hugo dans le même bateau (2016). En dépit de leurs différences apparentes, ces quatre films ont pour objectif de (re)produire et de transmettre des mémoires propres au sida et un intense affect actupien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".