Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comment parle-t-on des jeux vidéo au fil du temps dans la Belle Province? Peut-on parler d’une culture vidéoludique spécifiquement québécoise? Voilà les deux questions auxquelles nous tentons de répondre dans cet article. Prenant notre départ dans le catalogue général de Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (BAnQ), nous recensons les documents sur le jeu vidéo, nous attachant aux publications ou discours produits par des Québécois à l’intention d’un public québécois entre 1978 et 2018. Au fil de l’argumentation, nous signalons certaines limites du catalogue de BAnQ, discutons de l’accessibilité à la culture du jeu vidéo au Québec et des problèmes que pose sa préservation, et analysons quelques-uns des documents trouvés par le moteur de recherche de BAnQ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it