Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’auteure examine la façon dont des employées domestiques font de la reproduction sociale de leur foyer et de leur communauté un enjeu des relations avec leurs employeurs à l’île Maurice. Le matériau empirique sur lequel est basé cet article est composé des discours d’une quinzaine de femmes recueillis dans une situation d’enquête dont les conditions de production sont retracées. L’analyse de leurs subjectivités dans le travail de service domestique articule le contexte des rapports sociaux de l’espace côtier du sud-ouest de l’île avec celui de la restructuration de l’économie sucrière mauricienne depuis les années 2000 et celui plus global de la nouvelle division internationale du travail reproductif. L’examen des relations de service domestique du point de vue de femmes employées domestiques conduit à explorer les multiples dimensions — économique, sociale, normative et culturelle — de la recherche de la reproduction sociale de leur foyer et de leur communauté dans la conjoncture actuelle. Il en émerge des dissidences à la domination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".