Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article a pour but de montrer comment l’attention au végétal a été au coeur de l’une des contestations historiques les plus fortes du régime de séparation dualiste des Modernes. L’oeuvre d’Étienne Bonnot de Condillac combine ainsi un déplacement majeur de l’attention métaphysique aux plantes, de l’oeil à l’odeur, avec une enquête générale sur l’origine du langage. Cette combinaison érige les formes de la sensibilité en condition de l’institution. Le repérage de cette combinaison permet d’engager un dialogue avec l’oeuvre de Philippe Descola concernant la matrice ontologique générative des collectifs. Ce chemin de Condillac à Descola et retour n’est pas spéculatif : il s’enracine dans la mémoire affective de l’odeur des fleurs, qui sert ici de point archimédien au renversement du dualisme. Reste alors à savoir comment les plantes contribuent à l’institution des collectifs ou, au contraire, y résistent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".