Distributed Deep Reinforcement Learning for Intelligent Traffic Monitoring with a Team of Aerial Robots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies the traffic monitoring problem in a road network using a team of aerial robots. The problem is challenging due to two main reasons. First, the traffic events are stochastic, both temporally and spatially. Second, the problem has a non-homogeneous structure as the traffic events arrive at different locations of the road network at different rates. Accordingly, some locations require more visits by the robots compared to other locations. To address these issues, we define an uncertainty metric for each location of the road network and formulate a path planning problem for the aerial robots to minimize the network's average uncertainty. We express this problem as a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) and propose a distributed and scalable algorithm based on deep reinforcement learning to solve it. We consider two different scenarios depending on the communication mode between the agents (aerial robots) and the traffic management center (TMC). The first scenario assumes that the agents continuously communicate with the TMC to send/receive realtime information about the traffic events. Hence, the agents have global and real-time knowledge of the environment. However, in the second scenario, we consider a challenging setting where the observation of the aerial robots is partial and limited to their sensing ranges. Moreover, in contrast to the first scenario, the information exchange between the aerial robots and the TMC is restricted to specific time instances. We evaluate the performance of our proposed algorithm in both scenarios for a real road network topology and demonstrate its functionality in a traffic monitoring system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".