Influence of Intensive Ensemble Music Training on Children from a Lower Socioeconomic Status: An ERP Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low socioeconomic status (SES) children may experience positive outcomes through interventions.OrKidstra, an intervention program, provides musical training to low SES children in an intensive, ensemble, and social setting.This study examined the effect of OrKidstra training on children through an auditory Go/No-Go task with tone-locked (1100 and 2000Hz) Event-Related Potentials (ERPs).OrKidstra children demonstrated higher auditory discrimination than the comparison group for tones at 500, 1000, and 2000Hz during a hearing test, but accuracy and reaction times did not differ for the Go/No-Go task.ERP analyses revealed that OrKidstra children showed a greater spread of neural activity for auditory perception (pre-P300), they had earlier but smaller P300 peaks (associated with stimulus evaluation), and the late potentials (associated with inhibitory control) were more widely distributed.This study suggests that OrKidstra children tend to experience faster and more efficient neural processing to auditory stimuli, and emphasizes the importance of such interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".