MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3181596872 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/bpj73

NanoMi - An Open Source Transmission Electron Microscope

2020· article· en· W3181596872 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick Price

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroscopeElectron microscopeConventional transmission electron microscopeTransmission (telecommunications)Transmission electron microscopyOpticsComputer scienceScanning transmission electron microscopyPhysicsMaterials scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NanoMi is a project towards an open source modular electron microscope. It will allow to assemble transmission electron microscope (TEM) column, scanning TEM (STEM) column or scanning electron microscope (SEM) column. The goal of the NanoMi project is to establish framework for a community development of an electron microscope. Perhaps most important aspect is the license that covers the development: CERN Open Hardware v2, weakly reciprocal for hardware components. https://cern-ohl.web.cern.ch/ and GPL v3 for software (see below)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207