Effect of nutrient metabolism on cartilaginous tissue formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A major shortcoming in cartilage tissue engineering is the low biosynthetic response of chondrocytes. While different strategies have been investigated, a novel approach may be to control nutrient metabolism. Although known for their anaerobic metabolism, chondrocytes are more synthetically active under conditions that elicit mixed aerobic–anaerobic metabolism. Here, we postulate this metabolic switch induces HIF‐1α signaling resulting in improved growth. Transition to different metabolic states can result in the pooling of metabolites, several of which can stabilize HIF‐1α by interfering with PHD2. Chondrocytes cultured under increased media availability accelerated tissue deposition with the greatest effect occurring at 2 ml/106 cells. Under higher media availability, metabolism switched from anaerobic to mixed aerobic‐anaerobic. Around this transition, maximal changes in PHD2 activity, HIF‐1α expression, and HIF‐1 target gene expression were observed. Loss‐of‐function studies using YC‐1 confirmed the involvement of HIF‐1. Lastly, targeted metabolomic studies revealed that intracellular lactate and succinate correlated with PHD2 activity. This study demonstrates that cartilaginous tissue formation can be regulated by nutrient metabolism and that this response is mediated through changes in HIF‐1α signaling. By harnessing this newly identified metabolic switch, engineered cartilage implants may be developed without the need for sophisticated methods which could aid translation to the clinic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".