MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3181676326 · doi:10.1158/1538-7755.asgcr21-81

Abstract 81: Studying Ghanian Cancer Genomes Using Cell-free DNA

2021· article· en· W3181676326 on OpenAlexaff
Samuel Terkper Ahuno, Anna-Lisa Doebley, Thomas U. Ahearn, Joel Yarney, Nicholas Titiloye, Nancy Hamel, Ernest Adjei, Joe‐Nat Clegg‐Lamptey, Lawrence Edusei, Baffour Awuah, Xiaoyu Song, Verne Vanderpuye, Mustapha Abubakar, Máire A. Duggan, Daniel G. Stover, Kofi Nyarko, John M. S. Bartlet, Francis Aitpillah, Daniel Ansong, Kevin Gardner, A. Bowcock, Carlos Caldas, William D. Foulkes, Seth Wiafe, Wiafe-Addai, Montserrat García‐Closas, Alexander Kwarteng, Gavin Ha, Jonine D. Figueroa, Paz Polak

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of CalgaryMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcordanceBreast cancerCopy-number variationCancerOncologyGenomeMedicineInternal medicineCancer geneticsGeneBiologyGeneticsBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose: Analysis of cell free DNA could provide a rapid and non-invasive approach to detect cancer and provide new molecular insights in many African countries where expert pathology is lacking. Hence, we tested whether whole-genome sequencing of cfDNA (WGS-cfDNA) could identify somatic alterations that drive breast cancer. Methods: We conducted a pilot on 15 Ghanaian women (median age 49.5 years) recruited as part of the Ghana Breast Health Study. cfDNA was extracted and subjected to WGS at 30x and 0.1x. ichorCNA software was used to predict copy number alterations and ctDNA fractions. Results: We found extensive amplification and deletion of multiple chromosomal regions including those with oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes associated with breast cancer. Similar copy number alterations for selected breast cancer genes were observed with 0.1x and 30x cfDNA-WGS with increasing concordance between the two instruments as the ctDNA fraction increases. We observed a high frequency (>50%) of copy number gain in 3/5 regions and potential target genes for the amplification (chr8p11-12 [ZNF703] n=8, 53.3%; chr8q24.2 [MYC] n=9, 60%; chr19q12 [CCNE1] n=9, 60%), which were in agreement to previous observations among African-American (AA) ancestry compared to European-American (EA) ancestry in TCGA datasets. Conclusion: Our data provided evidence that ctDNA-based genomic studies are possible and ctDNA analysis could be a tool for future molecular oncology studies in Africa for cancer etiology, surveillance and clinical trials. Citation Format: Samuel Ahuno, Anna-Lisa Doebley, Thomas Ahearn, Joel Yarney, Nicholas Titiloye, Nancy Hamel, Ernest Adjei, Joe-Nat Clegg-Lamptey, Lawrence Edusei, Baffour Awuah, Xiaoyu Song, Verne Vanderpuye, Mustapha Abubakar, Maire Duggan, Daniel Stover, Kofi Nyarko, John Bartlet, Francis Aitpillah, Daniel Ansong, Kevin Gardner, Anne Bowcock, Carlos Caldas, William Foulkes, Seth Wiafe, Wiafe-Addai, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Alexander Kwarteng, Gavin Ha, Jonine Figueroa, Paz Polak, On Behalf Of Ghana Breast Health Study Team. Studying Ghanian Cancer Genomes Using Cell-free DNA [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual Symposium on Global Cancer Research; Global Cancer Research and Control: Looking Back and Charting a Path Forward; 2021 Mar 10-11. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021;30(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 81.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention→Same topicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→