MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3181703224 · doi:10.1089/jamp.2021.29040.whf

Deposition of Aerosols in the Lungs: Particle Characteristics

2021· review· en· W3181703224 on OpenAlexaff
Warren H. Finlay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle depositionDeposition (geology)Particle (ecology)Materials scienceChemical physicsParticle sizeVolatility (finance)ChemistryNanotechnologyMechanicsPhysicsComposite materialRange (aeronautics)Geology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Of the various particle properties that affect deposition in the respiratory tract, particle diameter and particle density are the most commonly considered, since their effect on deposition is well known and important, as has been discussed earlier in this chapter. However, there are several other particle properties that can affect particle deposition in the lungs. These include: 1) electrostatic charge on the particle, which can cause electrostatic forces to enhance deposition; 2) the shape of the particle, which can cause its trajectory to differ from that of a spherical particle and thereby alter its deposition; and 3) volatility of the particle i.e., its ability to condense or evaporate at its surface, which can change its diameter and in turn affect its deposition. In this section, we examine each of these three factors individually.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug DeliverySame topicInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207