MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3181710663 · doi:10.1061/jtepbs.0000549

Average Travel Time, Planning Time Index, and Buffer Time Index Thresholds for Freeway Weaving Sections, Merging Areas, and Diverging Areas

2021· article· en· W3181710663 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Transportation Engineering Part A Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsSNC-Lavalin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeavingSpeed limitIndex (typography)Travel timeTransport engineeringLimit (mathematics)Traffic volumeStatisticsComputer scienceSimulationEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efforts were initiated through the Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP) to quantify level of service (LOS) based on travel time and travel time reliability. To contribute to this goal, this study adopted a microscopic simulation-based method and researched the applicability of average travel time (ATT), planning time index (PTI), and buffer time index (BTI) to quantify freeway weaving section, merging area, and diverging area operational performance by the posted speed limit and number of lanes. A calibrated microscopic traffic simulation model was developed and validated using existing conditions data and then modified to generate density and travel time as outputs for various hypothetical analytical scenarios. Each simulation scenario included weaving sections, merging areas, and diverging areas with different posted speed limits, number of lanes, and traffic volumes. The ATT per 1.61 km (1 mi), PTI, and BTI were computed and compared with the density to examine the relationships and identify thresholds by the posted speed limit and number of lanes. The ATT per 1.61 km (1 mi) thresholds increase from LOS A through LOS F, whereas the PTI and BTI thresholds increase from LOS A through LOS D or LOS E and decrease thereafter. The ATT per 1.61 km (1 mi) thresholds increase as the posted speed limit decreases or the number of lanes decreases. However, the PTI and BTI thresholds could decrease as the posted speed limit decreases. The trends are fairly consistent for weaving sections, merging areas, and diverging areas. The differences in thresholds for merging and diverging areas, merging areas, and diverging areas indicate that separate thresholds are needed for merging areas and diverging areas, unlike what is currently provided in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Caution must be exercised when applying PTI and BTI thresholds for very uncongested or congested conditions. It is, therefore, recommended to categorize the PTI and BTI thresholds as highly reliable, moderately reliable, and unreliable, unlike the standard six ATT per 1.61 km (1 mi) or density LOS A through F categories. Alternatively, they could be used in conjunction with ATT per 1.61 km (1 mi) or density thresholds to assess congestion or reliability-related affects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.333
Threshold uncertainty score0.817

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it