Average Travel Time, Planning Time Index, and Buffer Time Index Thresholds for Freeway Weaving Sections, Merging Areas, and Diverging Areas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Efforts were initiated through the Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP) to quantify level of service (LOS) based on travel time and travel time reliability. To contribute to this goal, this study adopted a microscopic simulation-based method and researched the applicability of average travel time (ATT), planning time index (PTI), and buffer time index (BTI) to quantify freeway weaving section, merging area, and diverging area operational performance by the posted speed limit and number of lanes. A calibrated microscopic traffic simulation model was developed and validated using existing conditions data and then modified to generate density and travel time as outputs for various hypothetical analytical scenarios. Each simulation scenario included weaving sections, merging areas, and diverging areas with different posted speed limits, number of lanes, and traffic volumes. The ATT per 1.61 km (1 mi), PTI, and BTI were computed and compared with the density to examine the relationships and identify thresholds by the posted speed limit and number of lanes. The ATT per 1.61 km (1 mi) thresholds increase from LOS A through LOS F, whereas the PTI and BTI thresholds increase from LOS A through LOS D or LOS E and decrease thereafter. The ATT per 1.61 km (1 mi) thresholds increase as the posted speed limit decreases or the number of lanes decreases. However, the PTI and BTI thresholds could decrease as the posted speed limit decreases. The trends are fairly consistent for weaving sections, merging areas, and diverging areas. The differences in thresholds for merging and diverging areas, merging areas, and diverging areas indicate that separate thresholds are needed for merging areas and diverging areas, unlike what is currently provided in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Caution must be exercised when applying PTI and BTI thresholds for very uncongested or congested conditions. It is, therefore, recommended to categorize the PTI and BTI thresholds as highly reliable, moderately reliable, and unreliable, unlike the standard six ATT per 1.61 km (1 mi) or density LOS A through F categories. Alternatively, they could be used in conjunction with ATT per 1.61 km (1 mi) or density thresholds to assess congestion or reliability-related affects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".