MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3181989537 · doi:10.17118/11143/18448

Insécurité linguistique chez les enseignants non natifs de FLE : le cas des Colombiens

2020· article· fr· W3181989537 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCircula · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic and Sociocultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article s'intresse la notion d'inscurit linguistique dans les processus d'enseignement des langues trangres, notamment celle ressentie par les enseignants de franais non natifs en Colombie. Nous allons donc analyser les possibles raisons pour lesquelles les professeurs de franais langue trangre (FLE) colombiens ressentent cette inscurit, tout en abordant la notion et la reprsentation que se font ces enseignants du locuteur natif / non natif, ainsi que celles de langue maternelle ou premire (LM/L1), qui en sont trs proches. Nous prsenterons galement le statut et la place de la langue franaise en Colombie, avant d'voquer le rle jou par la formation des professeurs de FLE assure dans les universits colombiennes. Enfin, nous prsenterons quelques propositions pour tenter de remdier ce sentiment d'inscurit, et amliorer ainsi non seulement la qualit de la formation et du travail des professeurs de FLE, mais aussi leur vie en gnral.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it