MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3182002160 · doi:10.5267/j.ccl.2021.5.001

Analysis of selected allergens present in alcohol-based perfumes

2021· article· en· W3182002160 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anna Łętocha, R. Rachwalik

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Chemistry Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicContact Dermatitis and Allergies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCitronellolGeraniolCosmeticsEugenolLinaloolCitralFood scienceOrganic chemistryEssential oil

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the research was to analyse fragrance allergens in selected alcohol-based perfumery products with the application of gas chromatography. Toilet waters and scented waters were analysed. Samples of the selected perfumery products were tested for the presence of typical allergens, such as linalool, citral, citronellol, geraniol, eugenol and alpha-isomethyl ionone, in the so-called fragrance concentrate. The obtained results showed that each of the products contained at least a few of the above-mentioned allergens. Nevertheless, the majority of the analysed products satisfied the recommendations of the Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-food Products valid for cosmetics intended to remain on the skin for some time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Chemistry LettersSame topicContact Dermatitis and AllergiesFrench-language works237,207