MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3182017650 · doi:10.5267/j.ccl.2021.4.004

Synthesis and spectral characterization of some new thiazolopyrimidine derivatives

2021· article· en· W3182017650 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mahmoud S. Tolba, Mostafa Sayed, Shaban A. A. Abdel‐Raheem, Taher A. Gaber, Adel M. Kamal El‐Dean, Mostafa Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Chemistry Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and biological activity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChloroacetyl chlorideChemistryMalononitrilePhenacyl bromideAnilineNucleophilic substitutionPhenacylChlorineBromideBenzaldehydeDerivative (finance)Organic chemistryChlorideHeterocyclic compoundElemental analysisCombinatorial chemistryMedicinal chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thiazolopyrimidnes are considered one of the most interesting classes in heterocyclic chemistry due to their pharmaceutical importance. Herein, we report the synthesis of some new heterocyclic compounds containing thiazolopyrimidine starting from compound (1) which was previously prepared in literature. The starting compound was allowed to react with different alkylating agents such as chloroacetone, chloroacetyl chloride, and phenacyl bromide to afford derivatives (2-4). Compound (5), benzylidene derivative, was obtained by the reaction of compound (2) with benzaldehyde while amino-dicarbonitrile compound (6) can be obtained by the reaction of compound (5) and malononitrile. Acetylation of amino group in compound (6) with chloroacetyl chloride led to formation of compound (7). Nucleophilic substitution of chlorine in compound (7) by aniline gave compound (8) which further subjected the Munich reaction to form compound (9). All new synthesized compounds were characterized using different elemental and spectral analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Chemistry LettersSame topicSynthesis and biological activityFrench-language works237,207