The HAPPE plus Event-Related (HAPPE+ER) Software: A Standardized Processing Pipeline for Event-Related Potential Analyses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Event-Related Potential (ERP) designs are a common method for interrogating neurocognitive function with electroencephalography (EEG). However, the gold standard of preprocessing ERP data is manual-editing – a subjective, time-consuming processes. A number of automated pipelines have recently been created to address the need for standardization, automation, and quantification of EEG data processing; however, few are optimized for ERP analyses (especially in developmental or clinical populations). To fill this need, we propose and validate the HAPPE plus Event-Related (HAPPE+ER) software, a standardized and automated processing pipeline optimized for ERP analyses in EEG data. HAPPE+ER processes event- related potential data from raw files through a series of filtering, line noise reduction, bad channel detection, artifact rejection from continuous data, segmentation, and bad segment rejection methods. HAPPE+ER also includes post-processing reports of both data quality and pipeline quality metrics to facilitate the evaluation and reporting of data processing in a standardized manner. Finally, HAPPE+ER includes a post-processing script to facilitate generating ERP figures and measures for statistical analysis. We describe multiple approaches with both adult and developmental data to optimize and validate pipeline performance. HAPPE+ER software is freely available under the terms of GNU General Public License at https://github.com/PINE-Lab/HAPPE .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.061 | 0.040 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".