MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3182036749 · doi:10.1101/2021.04.28.441847

Using total RNA quality metrics for time since deposition estimates in degrading bloodstains

2021· preprint· en· W3182036749 on OpenAlexafffund
Colin Elliott, Theresa Stotesbury, Aaron B. A. Shafer

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsTrent UniversityOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTrent University
KeywordsRNAReplicateComputational biologyBiologyDegradation (telecommunications)Computer scienceMathematicsStatisticsGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Determining the time since deposition (TSD) of bloodstains would provide forensic scientists with critical information regarding the timeline of the events involving bloodshed. The physicochemical changes occurring to biomolecules as a bloodstain degrades can be used to approximate the TSD of bloodstains. Our study aims to quantify the timewise degradation trends and temperature dependence found in total RNA from bloodstains without the use of amplification, expanding the scope of the RNA TSD research which has previously targeted mRNA molecules. Whole bovine blood was stored in plastic microcentrifuge tubes at 21°C or 4°C and tested over different timepoints spanning one week. Nine RNA metrics were visually assessed and quantified using linear and mixed models; the RNA Integrity Number equivalent (RINe) and the DV200 demonstrated strong negative trends over time and statistical independence. The RINe model fit was high (R 2 = 0.60), and while including the biological replicate as a random effect increased the fit for all RNA metrics, no significant differences were found between biological replicates stored at the same temperature for the RINe and DV200 metrics. Importantly, this suggests that these standardized metrics can likely be directly compared between scenarios and individuals, with DV200 having an inflection point at ∼28 hrs. This study provides a novel approach for blood TSD estimates, producing metrics that are not affected by inter-individual variation and improving our understanding of the rapid degradation occurring in bloodstains. HIGHLIGHTS Amplification-free analysis of total RNA in degrading bloodstains. Short-term RNA degradation assessment using high-resolution size measurements. Total RNA quality and quantity metrics were assessed across a one-week. Total RNA quality metrics demonstrated the strongest timewise trends. Biological replicates produced similar results for RNA quality metrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207