Neural Dynamics of Inhibitory Control in Musicians with Absolute Pitch: Theta Synchrony as an Oscillatory Signature of Information Conflict
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Absolute pitch (AP) is the ability to identify an auditory pitch without prior context. Current theories posit AP involves automatic retrieval of referents. We tested interference in well-matched AP musicians, non-AP musicians, and nonmusicians with three auditory Stroop tasks. Stimuli were one of two sung pitches with congruent or incongruent verbal cues. The tasks used different lexicons: binary concrete adjectives (i.e., words: Low/High), syllables with no obvious semantic properties (i.e., solmization: Do/So), and abstract semiotic labels (i.e., orthographic: C/G). Participants were instructed to respond to pitch regardless of verbal information during electroencephalographic recording. Incongruent stimuli of words and solmization tasks increased errors and slowed response times (RTs), which was reversed in nonmusicians for the orthographic task. AP musicians made virtually no errors, but their RTs slowed for incongruent stimuli. Frontal theta (4–7 Hz) event-related synchrony was significantly enhanced during incongruence between 350 and 550 ms poststimulus onset in AP, regardless of lexicon or behavior. This effect was found in non-AP musicians and nonmusicians for word task, while orthographic task showed a reverse theta congruency effect. Findings suggest theta synchrony indexes conflict detection in AP. High beta (21–29 Hz) desynchrony indexes response conflict detection in non-AP musicians. Alpha (8–12 Hz) synchrony may reflect top-down attention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".