MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3182117606 · doi:10.7202/1078491ar

Les effets de l’Université de l’Ontario français

2021· article· fr· W3182117606 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jean-Bernard Robichaud

Bibliographic record

VenueEnjeux et société Approches transdisciplinaires · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesFrenchArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’Université de l’Ontario français (UOF), arrachée de longue lutte par la communauté franco-ontarienne, aura des retombées positives sur le plan économique et sociétal pour le Centre-Sud-Ouest de l’Ontario, pour la province et pour la francophonie tout entière. Les retombées économiques seront significatives dès sa quatrième année d’opération, mais les retombées pour la société seront encore plus importantes. L’UOF a le potentiel de répondre aux attentes de sa loi constitutive de contribuer à l’épanouissement d’une « culture francophone forte, dynamique et inclusive » (Gouvernement de l’Ontario, 2017).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnjeux et société Approches transdisciplinairesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207