MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3182122959 · doi:10.5802/crmath.196

An upper bound and finiteness criteria for the Galois group of weighted walks with rational coefficients in the quarter plane

2021· article· en· W3182122959 on OpenAlexaff
Ruichao Jiang, Javad Tavakoli, Yiqiang Q. Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueComptes Rendus Mathématique · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsCorollaryOrder (exchange)Upper and lower boundsDivision (mathematics)Group (periodic table)Simple (philosophy)Plane (geometry)Galois groupCombinatoricsPure mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysisArithmeticGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using Mazur’s theorem on torsions of elliptic curves, an upper bound 24 for the order of the finite Galois group <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>ℋ</mml:mi> </mml:math> associated with weighted walks in the quarter plane <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>ℤ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> is obtained. The explicit criterion for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>ℋ</mml:mi> </mml:math> to have order 4 or 6 is rederived by simple geometric arguments. Using division polynomials, a recursive criterion for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>ℋ</mml:mi> </mml:math> to have order <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> or <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> is also obtained. As a corollary, an explicit criterion for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>ℋ</mml:mi> </mml:math> to have order 8 is given through a method simpler than the existing one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComptes Rendus MathématiqueSame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207