MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Switched Model Predictive Control with Scheduled Mode Transitions without Terminal Constraints

2021· article· en· W3182144864 on OpenAlexaff
Tianyu Tan, Songlin Zhuang, Yang Shi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Dwell timeModel predictive controlConstraint (computer-aided design)Exponential stabilityTerminal (telecommunication)Mathematical optimizationStability (learning theory)Computer scienceSet (abstract data type)Class (philosophy)MathematicsControl (management)Nonlinear systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the switched model predictive control (MPC) problem for a class of constrained discrete-time switched linear systems with the minimum dwell-time restriction. According to the known information of the predesigned admissible switching sequences, the switched MPC problem is modified by taking into consideration the real-time updated truncated admissible switching (TAS) sequences so as to optimize the input actions with improved performance. Instead of using the conventional terminal constraints to ensure the closed-loop stability, a sufficient condition on the prediction horizon is derived under general assumptions to achieve the recursive feasibility and asymptotic stability of the closed-loop system. Furthermore, the algorithm which is employed to calculate the constrained dwell-time invariant (CDI) set is slightly modified to accommodate the input constraint. Based on the algorithm, the suboptimal estimated parameters are quantitatively gauged. The simulations are given to verify the theoretical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207