MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3182189538 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1954

Giant star-forming complexes in high-<i>z</i> main-sequence galaxy analogues: the internal structure of clumps in DYNAMO galaxies

2021· article· en· W3182189538 on OpenAlexafffund
Laura Lenkić, Alberto D. Bolatto, David B. Fisher, Karl Glazebrook, Danail Obreschkow, Roberto Abraham, Liyualem Ambachew

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
FundersDivision of Arctic SciencesAustralian Research CouncilJet Propulsion LaboratorySpace Telescope Science InstituteAssociation of Canadian Universities for Research in AstronomyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsDynamoGalaxyAstronomyExtinction (optical mineralogy)Star formationStarsPhotometry (optics)PopulationMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT To indirectly study the internal structure of giant clumps in main sequence galaxies at z ∼ 1–3, we target very turbulent and gas-rich local analogues from the DYNAMO sample with the Hubble Space Telescope, over a wavelength range of ∼200–480 nm. We present a catalogue of 58 clumps identified in six DYNAMO galaxies, including the WFC3/UVIS F225W, F336W, and F467M photometry where the (225–336) and (336–467) colours are sensitive to extinction and stellar population age, respectively. We measure the internal colour gradients of clumps themselves to study their age and extinction properties. We find a marked colour trend within individual clumps, where the resolved colour distributions show that clumps generally have bluer (336–467) colours (denoting very young ages) in their centres than at their edges, with little variation in the (225–336) colour associated with extinction. Furthermore, we find that clumps whose colours suggest they are older, are preferentially located closer towards the centres of their galaxies, and we find no young clumps at small galactocentric distances. Both results are consistent with simulations of high-redshift star-forming systems that show clumps form via violent disc instability, and through dynamic processes migrate to the centres of their galaxies to contribute to bulge growth on time-scales of a few 100 Myr, while continually forming stars in their centres. When we compare the DYNAMO clumps to those in these simulations, we find the best agreement with the long-lived clumps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→