MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3182238130 · doi:10.2172/1805031

Thermochemically-Informed Mass Transport Model for Zr in U-Zr Fuel

2020· report· en· W3182238130 on OpenAlexaff
Max Poschmann, M.H.A. Piro, Theodore M. Besmann, Srdjan Simunovic

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNuclear Materials and Properties
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiffusionMass transportConcentration gradientPhase (matter)Code (set theory)Simple (philosophy)ThermodynamicsConvection–diffusion equationStatistical physicsChemistryMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Chemical physicsPhysicsComputer scienceEnvironmental chemistryEngineering physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent improvements to the coupled Thermochimica-MOOSE/BISON code system have enabled efficient calculations of species transport based on direct evaluation of composition and temperature dependent chemical potentials of the species. This presents an alternative to the traditional approach to species transport in nuclear fuels, which has been to employ a diffusion formulation that combines concentration-gradient driven Fickian diffusion with a Soret term based on a heat of transport fit to experimental data. Here we describe the application of the coupled code system to the diffusion of Zr in U-Zr metallic fuel. New classes implemented in BISON to solve this problem are documented. The Zr concentration profile after 50 years of diffusion is found to be strongly dependent on the assumptions made pertaining how to mobility is calculated in multi-phase regions of the fuel element. Two assumptions are compared (simple averaging of mobilities and using the majority phase mobility), and good qualitative agreement with experimental measurements is obtained using the majority phase assumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNuclear Materials and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207