MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3182293030 · doi:10.7202/1078725ar

Le jeu vidéo au Québec

2021· article· fr· W3182293030 on OpenAlex
Bernard Perron

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueLoading · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Games and Media
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le Qubec demeure certes un haut lieu du jeu vido au Canada. Comme le soulignent ou le rapportent les collaborateurs et collaboratrices de ce numro afin de marquer la reconnaissance et l'intrt du sujet d'analyse, la province se distingue sur le march mondial de l'industrie culturelle la plus lucrative au monde (Maude Bonenfant et Jonathan Bonneau) ; elle est prsentement un leader international dans le dveloppement du jeu vido dit mainstream, [et] son cosystme de dveloppeurs indie n'est pas en reste (Jonathan Lessard et Carl Therrien); Montral est considre comme la capitale du jeu vido 1 (Laureline Chiapello); bref, [q]uand on pense au jeu vido au Qubec, c'est immdiatement son industrie qui nous vient l'esprit (Adam Lefloc Lebel).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it