MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3182419356 · doi:10.36106/gjra/6311237

MEDICARE AI-ASSISTED AI IN HEALTHCARE

2021· article· en· W3182419356 on OpenAlexaff
Nitish Nagar, Plaban Roy, Saurabh Deswal, Parth H Pandya, Aashna Bhardwaj, Parisa Naraei

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBAL JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH ANALYSIS · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Canadian institutionsLambton College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInstantHealth careOrder (exchange)Computer scienceDiseaseMedicineMedical emergencyBusinessPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Articial Intelligence is nowadays at the peak, and considering chatbots is one of the primary examples contributing to success. In the project paper, we implemented an instant diagnostic medical checkup for the patient, which can help doctors/healthcare providers, as this order saves time. By analyzing the symptoms, the Assist AI system will help determine the severity of the disease in real-time and will respectively guide the patient with the different stages – disease denition, precaution and recommendation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.349
GPT teacher head0.616
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGLOBAL JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH ANALYSISSame topicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationFrench-language works237,207