Controle social informal e a responsabilização de jovens infratores
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Explicações da criminalidade baseadas em teorias de controle social defendem que o enfraquecimento dos laços sociais e a não internalização dos padrões morais favorecem o cometimento de crimes. O objetivo deste estudo foi verificar se jovens infratores que cumprem medidas socioeducativas em meio aberto e já passaram, ou não, por medida de internação apresentam diferenças na intensidade em que estiveram submetidos a fatores que operam o controle social informal. Foi utilizado um survey aplicado a 243 jovens em cumprimento de medida socioeducativa em meio aberto em Minas Gerais, que compõem a amostra deste estudo. A metodologia de análise incluiu a estimação de modelos de regressão logística binomial. Os resultados apontaram que os socioeducandos que estão submetidos, de forma mais intensiva, a determinados fatores de controle social, apresentam menores chances de estarem em progressão de medida, ou seja, de terem cumprido algum tipo de medida socioeducativa de internação no passado.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".