MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3182429082

Do NAFTA ao USMCA: Trump e os interesses nacionais

2019· article· pt· W3182429082 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karina Lilia Pasquariello Mariano, Angelo Raphael Mattos, Daniela Rodrigues Sugahara

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Relations in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRatificationNegotiationPolitical scienceGovernment (linguistics)Administration (probate law)International tradeFree trade agreementProduct (mathematics)Public administrationFree tradeLawPoliticsEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was a central theme in candidate Donald Trump’s election campaign, and in his government agenda. This article analyzes the negotiation process that led to the replacement of NAFTA by the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), discussing the stance of the U.S. government in the renegotiation, as well as the main changes contained in the new agreement and the tensions generated for its ratification before the U.S. Congress. The article seeks to demonstrate that the USMCA is not a product of the Trump administration, but the result of a domestic agenda marked by multiple interests and actors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1050.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInternational Relations in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207