Three-compartment-breast (3CB) prior-guided diffuse optical tomography based on dual-energy digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diffuse optical tomography (DOT) is a non-invasive functional imaging modality that uses near-infrared (NIR) light to measure the oxygenation state and the concentration of hemoglobin. By complementarily using DOT with other anatomical imaging modalities, physicians can diagnose more accurately through additional functional image information. In breast imaging, diagnosis of dense breasts is often challenging because the bulky fibrous tissues may hinder the correct tumor characterization. In this work, we proposed a three-compartment-breast (3CB) decomposition-based prior-guided optical tomography for enhancing DOT image quality. We conjectured that the 3CB prior would lead to improvement of the spatial resolution and also of the contrast of the reconstructed tumor image, particularly for the dense breasts. We conducted a Monte-Carlo simulation to acquire dual-energy X-ray projections of a realistic 3D numerical breast phantom and performed digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) for setting up a 3CB model. The 3CB prior was then used as a structural guide in DOT image reconstruction. The proposed method resulted in the higher spatial resolution of the recovered tumor even when the tumor is surrounded by the fibroglandular tissues compared with the typical two-composition-prior method or the standard Tikhonov regularization method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".