Infrared and Visible Image Fusion Based on Deep Decomposition Network and Saliency Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditional image fusion focuses on selecting an effective decomposition approach to extract representative features from the source image and attempts to find appropriate fusion rules to merge extracted features respectively. However, the existing image decomposition tools are mostly based on kernels or global energy-optimized functions limiting the performance of the wide range of image contents. This paper proposes a novel infrared and visible image fusion method based on deep decomposition network and saliency analysis (named DDNSA). First, the modified residual dense network (MRDN) is trained with a publicly available dataset to learn the decomposition process. Second, the structure and texture features of source images are separated by the trained decomposition network. Then, according to the characteristics of the above features, we construct the combination of local and global saliency maps by using stacked sparse autoencoder and visual saliency mechanism to fuse the structural features. Besides, we propose a bi-direction edge-strength fusion strategy for merging the texture features. Finally, the resultant image is reconstructed by combining the fused structure and texture features. The experimental results confirm that our proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in both visual perception and objective evaluation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it