MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3182802386

Історіографія діяльності педагогічних персоналій Слобожанщини – фундаторів медичної та фармацевтичної освіти в Україні (ХІХ – поч. ХХ ст.)

2013· article· uk· W3182802386 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tetyana Lutaeva

Bibliographic record

VenuePedagogical Discourse · 2013
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Social Development in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersonality psychologyHistoriographyIdeologyQuarter (Canadian coin)Power (physics)CommunismSociologyClassicsHistoryLiteratureSocial sciencePedagogyPersonalityHumanitiesPsychologyPolitical scienceLawPhilosophySocial psychologyArtPoliticsArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is devoted to the historiography of pedagogical personalities’ activities – the founders of the national medical and pharmaceutical education in the 19th – early 20th century. Three historiographical stages of the study have been distinguish. It was noted that at the first stage (early 19th – early 20th centuries) analysis of the medical and pharmaceutical educatorʼs activity has been linked to the characteristic of University education that was under the influence of a great-power ideology, and at the second stage (the first quarter of the 20th century – the end of the 1980s) the  new approaches to the evaluation of pedagogical personalities’ activity were searched under the rule of the communist ideology. It was proved that at the third stage (since 1991) the research of pedagogical personalities has been carried out at a new level, taking into account both the personal,  social and scientific determinants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0540.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.178
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePedagogical DiscourseSame topicEducation and Social Development in UkraineFrench-language works237,207