Історіографія діяльності педагогічних персоналій Слобожанщини – фундаторів медичної та фармацевтичної освіти в Україні (ХІХ – поч. ХХ ст.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to the historiography of pedagogical personalities’ activities – the founders of the national medical and pharmaceutical education in the 19th – early 20th century. Three historiographical stages of the study have been distinguish. It was noted that at the first stage (early 19th – early 20th centuries) analysis of the medical and pharmaceutical educatorʼs activity has been linked to the characteristic of University education that was under the influence of a great-power ideology, and at the second stage (the first quarter of the 20th century – the end of the 1980s) the new approaches to the evaluation of pedagogical personalities’ activity were searched under the rule of the communist ideology. It was proved that at the third stage (since 1991) the research of pedagogical personalities has been carried out at a new level, taking into account both the personal, social and scientific determinants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".