MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

2009· review· en· W31828199 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paul B. Pencharz, Glenn Berall, Mary Corey, Peter R. Durie, Nachum Vaisman

Bibliographic record

VenueNutrition Reviews · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSick childMedicineFamily medicineLibrary sciencePediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Letters to the Editor Get access Paul B. Pencharz, MB, ChB, PhD, Paul B. Pencharz, MB, ChB, PhD Divisions of Clinical Nutrition, Gastroenterology and Chest, and the Research Institute The Hospital for Sick Children 555 University Ave Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Glenn Berall, MD, Glenn Berall, MD Divisions of Clinical Nutrition, Gastroenterology and Chest, and the Research Institute The Hospital for Sick Children 555 University Ave Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Mary Corey, MSc, Mary Corey, MSc Divisions of Clinical Nutrition, Gastroenterology and Chest, and the Research Institute The Hospital for Sick Children 555 University Ave Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Peter Durie, MD, Peter Durie, MD Divisions of Clinical Nutrition, Gastroenterology and Chest, and the Research Institute The Hospital for Sick Children 555 University Ave Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Nachum Vaisman, MD Nachum Vaisman, MD Divisions of Clinical Nutrition, Gastroenterology and Chest, and the Research Institute The Hospital for Sick Children 555 University Ave Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Nutrition Reviews, Volume 47, Issue 1, January 1989, Pages 31–32, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.1989.tb02750.x Published: 01 January 1989

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.455
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNutrition ReviewsSame topicChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFrench-language works237,207