Modes de vie de lesbiennes brésiliennes immigrantes au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se penche sur le profil de trois femmes lesbiennes brésiliennes ayant émigré au Québec (Canada) et faisant partie d’un groupe de Brésiliennes et Brésiliens LGBT actif sur les réseaux sociaux. Notre étude exploratoire enquête sur divers aspects de leur vécu, tels que les raisons de leur migration, la façon dont elles organisent leur vie dans un pays théoriquement plus « ouvert à la diversité sexuelle » et leur évolution dans l’environnement LGBT. Nous avons opté pour une approche qualitative et ouverte, en menant des entrevues en profondeur, dont l’analyse fait émerger des pistes et questions de recherche à poursuivre. En valorisant les contributions orales de ces femmes ainsi que leurs productions analytiques, notre but est de favoriser un processus de visibilité et de constitution du sujet politique : celui qui peut être, qui peut faire partie et qui peut contribuer politiquement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".