Robust Design of Multicell D2D Communication Under Partial CSI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider device-to-device (D2D) communication underlaid in a cellular network to share the uplink resource of cellular users (CUs). It is a key the emerging Internet of Things to support vehicle-to-everything communication networks. In a multicell scenario, both D2D pairs and CUs may cause significant significant intercell interference (ICI) to the neighboring cells. Furthermore, due to substantial signaling overhead, we assume only partial channel state information (CSI) of D2D links at the base station. We consider joint power control, beamforming, and CU-D2D matching problem, assuming partial CSI from D2D pairs under the general Nakagami fading model. We formulate a joint receive beamforming and robust power control optimization problem for a CU-D2D pair to expected sum rate under the power budget, while meeting the minimum SINR requirements and worst case ICI limits at neighboring cells in a probabilistic sense. We propose an efficient algorithm that combines an iterative D2D feasibility check and a ratio-of-expectation approximation. A performance upper bound is also developed for benchmarking. For multiple CUs and D2D pairs, due to orthogonal channelization within each cell, we first focus on the problem of joint power control and beamforming for a CU-D2D pair and show how our proposed solution can be leveraged to find a solution for this general problem. The complexity analysis of the proposed approach is also provided. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm gives performance close to the upper bound.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".