MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3183005013 · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3096139

An Optimised Multivariable Regression Model for Predictive Analysis of Diabetic Disease Progression

2021· article· en· W3183005013 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultivariable calculusComputer scienceRegression analysisMean squared errorField (mathematics)Health careData miningRegressionPredictive modellingLinear regressionTime seriesArtificial intelligenceMachine learningStatisticsEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the advent of smart systems and smart IoT network all over the world leading to enormous amount of data generation; the right analysis and decision making based on the relevant data plays a crucial role. Various industries such as transportation, retail, healthcare etc. rely on analysis using this huge volumes of data for intelligent decision making. In smart healthcare system, accurate analysis of patients' data and prediction of diseases and medicine is important. To a great extent, fatalities can be avoided by timely recommendation of healthcare measures and immediate alert on emergency conditions. The use of machine learning algorithm for precise predictive analysis of data can be very promising in the field of healthcare. In this paper, optimised Multivariable Linear regression method is used to predict the diabetic disease progression of 442 patients based on various parameters such as age, gender, Body Mass Index and 6 different blood serum measurements. Here optimisation is performed using feature reduction and logarithmic transformation. The predicted output is found to be closely associated with actual output data with a Root Mean Square Error of 1.5 units; which indicates higher accuracy in comparison with the non-optimised model with the error of 54 units. There has also been a comparison with the results obtained from other state of the art regression methods, which proves that the proposed model exhibits maximum accuracy. This method can be used to provide promising medical advice to the patients on how to reduce the diabetic disease progression over a year by controlling various health parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.435
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.221
GPT teacher head0.556
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it